Disorder might also mean a greater number of possibilities permitted or allowed compared to a state where the possibilities were less.
One can observe through the lenses of chaos and order, when observing some new behavior, that behavior tends to be conceived of as chaotic, when old behavior patterns emerge these are said to be orderly. What the body systems are satisfied with are patterns that are orderly, feeling comfortable in the established regularity, decreasing entropy. Some people have trouble moving out of their comfort zones, because they will encounter a new experience that disturbs their equilibrium.
1) Focus : My first blog talked about decreasing disorder as a effect of focusing, or single-mindedness. The rule is, that as you decrease the outcomes you have in mind, the more probable the outcomes left are, and therefore the more order arises. The complexity of a life may be thought of in terms of the number of outcomes the person partakes in achieving on a daily basis.
2) Environment : I have also come across the ideas that order is the result of organizing your environment. It can be part of your identity to do chores that organize your environment. It might even be part of your occupation to organize things. The mind can be cleared of disorder in having to repeat organizing the environment in a "desired and repetitious pattern." This might sound complex, but its as simple as putting cups in cupboard.
3) Identity : Order is the result of the behaviors which consist as part of your identity. The behaviors that consist of your identity are a part of routine or habits, and these can be thought of fairly clearly, as emerging from your center. One can depict this emergence through a rough sketch up of this idea, and use it to add in possible behaviors that one wishes to have become their actual life, or eliminate behaviors that one wants to no longer experience.
4) Social : It might be thought that if you have relations with people you know, that you can decrease the disorder of your social life by limiting your relations to a number of people. Social life always becomes more disordered as a result of increasing the number of relations you have. The more variation in those people, the more they are not alike, the more complexity that arises out of your center.
5) Government : Order also exists as a governmental necessity. The very laws that are accepted, and the behaviors that come of them are a part of maintaining an enforced order. This order can be replaced through the majority instigating the order, but not if the government and those giving the orders, is stronger than the majority. In this sense it might be in the greatest of the interest of the people to ensure that the majority always can superseded the laws of the government.
Establishing laws that are enforced through the forces of punishment are a way of ensuring that the world created from this order continue to exist. Without a central government or laws and rights existing therein, anarchy as it were, would be no more than disorder.
Currently, we live in the order of Survival: live or die, and our powers to determine the actual world are minute, very centered to ourselves.
Even in anarchy, the powers that produce life and produce death would have existence as they do now, but in such a lawless state, there would be no justice, no being held accountable, and there would be unleashing of the malevolent and aggressive, upon society. For these reasons I oppose anarchist society, a state of societal disorder.
The Leviathan (1651), in which Thomas Hobbes defended absolute monarchy and justified centralized government as necessary because the condition of Man in the apolitical state of nature is a “war of all against all”, for which reason the lives of men and women are “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” without the political organization of people and resources.
This is not to say any society with laws does not lead to individual expressions of unwarranted aggression, but when people exist within the boundaries of enforced law and order, they are less likely to behave with misconduct towards their fellow citizens.
Anarchist extremists would do away with all human rights, including rights and legalities upholding personal property, ownership, imprisonment, the entire justice system, the separation of powers, as these by their very principle are law bound. Looking into past examples of such people or tribes, we may refer to the Indians or the Vikings. There will be violent human beings in any large society, but abiding by laws of the state of non-harm, enforcing security over those that act against the property, well-being, and lives of others, and by limiting (blocking) sensory consumption of violent interactions violence can be mitigated; furthermore by making certain drugs that reduce the quality of life illegal, benefits the health and productivity of the nation's citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment